Today: 22.Jul.2017
How two nuclear projects bankrupted Westinghouse (Reuters, Tom Hals, Emily Flitter)
02.May.2017
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Reuters, Tom Hals, Emily Flitter: In 2012, construction of a Georgia nuclear power plant stalled for eight months as engineers waited for the right signatures and paperwork needed to ship a section of the plant from a factory hundreds of miles away. The approach - building prefabricated sections of the plants before sending them to the construction sites for assembly - was supposed to revolutionize the industry by making it cheaper and safer to build nuclear plants. But Westinghouse miscalculated the time it would take, and the possible pitfalls involved, in rolling out its innovative AP1000 nuclear plants, according to a close examination by Reuters of the projects. The miscalculations underscore the difficulties facing a global industry that aims to build about 160 reactors and is expected to generate around $740 billion in sales of equipment in services in the coming decade, according to nuclear industry trade groups.

Read 120 times Last modified on Tuesday, 02 May 2017 14:00
  • Latest
  • Popular
  • This is a short video by the…
  • This is a three and a half…
  • Jeremy Li, IAEA: Radiopharmaceuticals are a key…
  • World Council on Isotopes, 2016 China, Japan,…
  • European Association of Nuclear Medicine: At an…
  • World Council on Isotopes, 2016 China, Japan,…
  • Jeremy Li, IAEA: Radiopharmaceuticals are a key…
  • European Association of Nuclear Medicine: Heart catheterizations…
  • European Association of Nuclear Medicine: Prostate cancer…
  • Association of Imaging Producers & Equipment Suppliers:…