Today: 23.Nov.2017
How two nuclear projects bankrupted Westinghouse (Reuters, Tom Hals, Emily Flitter) USofA
02.May.2017
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Reuters, Tom Hals, Emily Flitter: In 2012, construction of a Georgia nuclear power plant stalled for eight months as engineers waited for the right signatures and paperwork needed to ship a section of the plant from a factory hundreds of miles away. The approach - building prefabricated sections of the plants before sending them to the construction sites for assembly - was supposed to revolutionize the industry by making it cheaper and safer to build nuclear plants. But Westinghouse miscalculated the time it would take, and the possible pitfalls involved, in rolling out its innovative AP1000 nuclear plants, according to a close examination by Reuters of the projects. The miscalculations underscore the difficulties facing a global industry that aims to build about 160 reactors and is expected to generate around $740 billion in sales of equipment in services in the coming decade, according to nuclear industry trade groups.

Read 330 times Last modified on Thursday, 05 October 2017 15:37

Newsletter Subscription

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Meredith Angwin, Physical Chemist, Naturalist, Educator: The…
  • Michel Gay: Pour ceux qui en doutaient…
  • Alex Epstein explains the most fundamental facts…
  • Edward Calabrese, Professor of Toxicology at the…
  • Keeping America’s nuclear plants safe in the…
  • Michael Shellenberger, Environmental Progress: Let’s look at…
  • Michel Gay: Pour ceux qui en doutaient…
  • Meredith Angwin, Physical Chemist, Naturalist, Educator: The…