Today: 22.Jul.2018
“Green” Energy Fails Every Test (John Hinderaker, POWERLINE) USofA
06.Nov.2017
Rate this item
(0 votes)

John Hinderaker, POWERLINE blog: Minnesota is a poor place for solar power, so its renewable policies have focused on wind. Minnesota has gone whole hog for wind energy, to the tune of approximately $15 billion. It is noteworthy that demand for electricity in Minnesota has been flat for quite a few years, so that $15 billion wasn’t spent to meet demand. Rather, it replaced electricity that already was being produced by coal, nuclear and natural gas plants. Wind energy is intermittent and unreliable; it can only be produced when the wind is blowing within certain parameters, and cannot be stored at scale. It is expensive and inefficient, and therefore patently inferior to nuclear, coal and natural gas-powered electricity, except in one respect–its “greenness.”

Read 187 times Last modified on Monday, 19 March 2018 11:31

Newsletter Subscription

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • World Nuclear Association: • Switzerland has five…
  • World Nuclear Association: • Nuclear power capacity…
  • Madison Freeman, www.defenseone.com, Council of Foreign Relations:…
  • GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) is to…
  • Paul Driessen, Senior Policy Analyst for the…
  • World Nuclear Association: • Switzerland has five…
  • World Nuclear Association: • Nuclear power capacity…
  • Madison Freeman, www.defenseone.com, Council of Foreign Relations:…