Thorpe Watson, Ph.D. in Physical Metallurgy & Science of Materials. Thirty five year career covering wide range of science disciplines plus 10 year investigation of the climate controversy: We have been told that the carbon dioxide (“CO2”) generated by the consumption of hydrocarbon fuels will cause runaway warming. Our only salvation is to embrace a carbon-free economy or pay indulgences (aka “carbon tax”). How a tax will ward off such a serious threat defies any rational explanation. It is absurd to believe that a carbon-free economy will stabilize the planet's ever-changing climate. However, a carbon-free economy will devastate modern lifestyles.
O.R. Adams, Jr., Jennifer Marohasy: O.R. Adams, a lawyer and serious student of science, presents his case about carbon dioxide from fossil fuels not being an important factor in claims of man global warming. His key scientist witness is Dr. Jennifer Marohasy in Australia. The main data are CO2 and temperature records of the Mauna Loa, Hawaii Observatory, both measured night and day. The temperature data is not well known and is key to this article. What do you students, teachers, scientists, the public and political leaders around the world think?
Michael Hart book author, Michael Kelly book reviewer: Let us be clear at the outset: the global climate is changing, and has always been changing. The earth has warmed by 1C over the last 150 years. That is not the issue. The issue is whether the human emissions of carbon dioxide since 1850 are heralding an imminent and certain global climate catastrophe that could be averted by engineering projects.
O.R. Adams Jr. is a retired lawyer. He prepared this paper about carbon dioxide cooling the Earth thoroughly as when he presented cases before the Supreme Court. This is a combination of having the facts, references and presenting it well.
O.R. Adams Jr. is a retired lawyer. He prepared this paper in 2011 about CO2 from fossil fuels and man-made global warming. He did it as thoroughly as a lawyer would to present a case before the U.S. Supreme Court. It is a combination of knowing the facts, having references and presenting it well. See comments dated December, 2016 by geologist, Robert (Robin) Richards, in South Africa on page 29.
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman, Physicist, Nobel laureate
Ed Berry, Atmospheric Physicist presents arguments why CO2 from fossil fuels is not causing serious global warming.
Uli Weber: Kohlendioxid (CO2) hat also eine Klimasensitivität von deutlich weniger als 1,0 [°C/2xCO2] und kann damit weder aktuell noch für die geologische Vergangenheit der bestimmende Klimaantrieb für die Temperaturschwankungen auf unserer Erde sein.
Bill Mundhausen: The controversy among scientists doesn't stop at mere observation, but extends to recommendations about what actions we humans might take. Unfortunately, as long as money and power are in the equation, we may not get to good science for a time. We must therefore remain reasonably skeptical of climate-change claims. As both scientists and consumers of scientific reporting, we must recognize that the overall picture is unsettled and that we must not allow political advocacy to censor any views or steer our judgment.
Uli Weber, www.kaltesonne.de - Das Problem: Der natürliche Kohlenstoffdioxid-Kreislauf (Abbildung 1) auf unserem Planeten Erde steht in Verdacht, durch den industriellen CO2-Eintrag des Menschen aus den Fugen zu geraten und eine globale Klimakatastrophe zu verursachen. Aber ist dieser natürliche CO2-Kreislauf überhaupt voll verstanden und richtig in die Computermodelle zur Vorhersage des zukünftigen Klimas eingegangen?
Norman Page, geologist: To the detriment of the reputation of science in general, establishment climate scientists made two egregious errors of judgment in their method of approach to climate forecasting and thus in their advice to policy makers in successive SPMs. First, they based their analyses on inherently untestable and specifically structurally flawed models which included many questionable assumptions. Second they totally ignored the natural, solar driven, millennial and multi-decadal quasi-cycles.
Subscribe to Newsletter