Today: 16.Dec.2017

John Hinderaker, POWERLINE blog: Minnesota is a poor place for solar power, so its renewable policies have focused on wind. Minnesota has gone whole hog for wind energy, to the tune of approximately $15 billion. It is noteworthy that demand for electricity in Minnesota has been flat for quite a few years, so that $15 billion wasn’t spent to meet demand. Rather, it replaced electricity that already was being produced by coal, nuclear and natural gas plants. Wind energy is intermittent and unreliable; it can only be produced when the wind is blowing within certain parameters, and cannot be stored at scale. It is expensive and inefficient, and therefore patently inferior to nuclear, coal and natural gas-powered electricity, except in one respect–its “greenness.”

Published in Energy Today

POWERLINE, John Hinderaker: In the debate about serious man-made global warming, there are two types of evidence. The first is the raw material of science, observation. The second is climate models created by alarmists for the purpose of generating scary scenarios. Anyone with the slightest acquaintance with science understands that observation (type 1) trumps theory (type2). Which is a serious problem for the warmists, since temperature records show that their models are wrong.

Newsletter Subscription

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Michel Gay: L’exemple récent du Brexit a…
  • Michel Gay: Le samedi 26 avril 1986,…
  • Michel Gay: Les résultats les plus récents…
  • Michel Gay: Une partie des écologistes s'est…
  • Michel Gay: Le 6 novembre 2015, l'Administration…
  • Michel Gay: Une partie des écologistes s'est…
  • Michel Gay: Les résultats les plus récents…
  • Michel Gay: Le samedi 26 avril 1986,…
  • Michel Gay: L’exemple récent du Brexit a…